Open Letter to Ministers for Women

The Emergence of Ministers for Men is Not a Threat — It is a Test of Whether Gender Policy can Grow Up

The emergence of ministers, envoys and shadow ministers for men should not be treated as a threat to women’s policy or competition for resources. It should be treated as a test of whether Australia’s gender-policy architecture is mature enough to recognise more than one form of vulnerability at a time.

Women’s and men’s safety and dignity matter. Children’s relational security matters. A serious public policy system should be able to hold these truths together without converting them into a hierarchy of moral worth and locking them into a victim-perpetrator binary.

This letter should be read alongside the open letter to aspiring Ministers for Men. Together, they call for a civic compact on relational violence because, in the end, women and men cannot do this work without each other.

A serious Minister for Men and a serious Minister for Women would jointly commit to:

1. Women’s safety without male demonisation.
2. Male identity and dignity without denial of violence, coercion or abuse experienced by women.
3. Children’s relational security without adult ownership claims.
4. Protection, repair and restoration of family relationships where this is safe, evidence-supported and consistent with children’s developmental needs.
5. Evidence-sensitive assessment of violence, coercion, alienation and abuse on an equal basis.
6. Recognition of all victims and perpetrators, including male victims and female perpetrators.
7. Protection of masculinity and femininity as lived identities, not ideological caricatures.
8. Institutional trust, so people can seek help without being pre-classified.

What These Commitments Ask of You

These commitments do not ask Ministers for Women to compromise women’s safety. They ask them to lead the next stage of gender policy.

The “Women and Children” Narrative is No Longer the Basis for Policy

The phrase “violence against women and children” names serious harms but it narrows women, narrows men, and risks subordinating children’s independent relational needs to adult gender conflict.

A Minister for Men is an Opportunity

A serious Minister for Women should not treat the emergence of Ministers for Men as competition. She should treat it as an opportunity to build a better settlement.

Are You Ready?

The test is whether a Minister for Women can sit down with a Minister for Men and ask a harder question: what would it take to build a relational-violence policy capable of recognising all victims, all perpetrators, all children’s relational needs, and the civic dignity of both women and men?

See The Full Letter

Similar Posts:

• Anti Parental Alienation Protestor Kicks Own Goal
• Parental Alienation On The Air
• Response to UN Special Rapporteur’s Call for Input: Custody Cases, Violence against Women and Children
• What Happens When Men become Alienated from their Children?
• Family Violence Orders: Should You Really Apply For Them?