Australian institutions can act urgently to protect a child but remain unclear about who must gather the evidence, review the restriction, correct the record and repair avoidable harm afterwards.
Human rights must protect people from dangerous relationships
They must also prevent interim action, institutional delay or error from causing avoidable rupture of safe and significant family relationships.
My new Relational Justice article proposes one governing rule:
Institutions should use the least relationally disruptive effective intervention consistent with safety and relational continuity—and remain accountable for what their intervention produces.
Read the article at https://alienatedtoo.substack.com/p/human-rights-should-protect-family?r=3rl5f5.
If you want to help test this framework against law, research, practice and institutional experience, subscribe free and reply RIGHTS.
Similar Posts:
- “Parental Alienation Becomes a Successful Tactic”, Parental Alienation and False Allegations Discussed in The Australian Senate
- Hope for Reconnection and Reunification after Parental Alienation
- Are Mothers and Children being Silenced in the Family Court?
- Family Violence Orders: Should You Really Apply For Them?
- Parental Alienation Gets Publicity In The Australian
Leave a Reply