Why The Relational Justice Project is about more than readership
The Relational Justice Project is growing. Most of those subscribers have come through the Dialogue In Growth community.
That tells me something important.
There is an audience for the proposition that family relationships are social infrastructure and that relational harm deserves public recognition, institutional accountability and repair.
But audiences are not constituencies.
That is the challenge now:
- To turn opens into clicks.
- Clicks into subscribers.
- Subscribers into constituents.
A subscriber receives writing. A constituent recognises that the issue matters beyond one essay, one family, one court case or one private experience.
The Relational Justice Project is therefore not simply seeking readers. It is seeking people who believe that relational harm should become visible, that family relationships should not be treated as disposable, and that these ideas deserve public force.
I have written more about the difference between a subscriber and a constituent here: https://substack.com/@alienatedtoo/note/p-206260036?r=3rl5f5&utm_source=notes-share-action&utm_medium=web
If this speaks to you, please read it. Every constituency begins somewhere. Start here.
And if you believe relational justice matters, subscribe.
Similar Posts:
- CLOSING: Research into the Lived Experience of Parental Alienation in a Social Context
- Overturning The “Ban” on Overnight Stays for Alienated Toddlers
- Family Law Amendment Bill 2023: An Anti-Family and Anti-Child Law
- Parental Alienation at the APS College of Counselling Psychologists Conference 2015
- Alienated Children: The ‘Humpty Dumpty’ Factor
Leave a Reply